From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

The criticism sections seems very biased. It basically follows what the P&R department of project INDECT has been feeding the media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 07:50, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

This is true. I've added the Controversy section from the 4th of October, which a vandal had removed. Also, at least two claim in the section is not supported by the source it cites. I therefore added the "not in citation given" tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Deathmare (talkcontribs) 15:12, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on INDECT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)