Talk:ISO/IEC 19770

Move page to ISO/IEC 19770[edit]

This page should be moved to ISO/IEC 19770 as this is the correct designation for the one completed, one draft, and two additional proposed parts of this standard (four parts in all by the time it is completed). I plan to make this move soon if no one posts any objections here. Jazzdanse (talk) 03:00, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved Lmatt (talk) 14:41, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

This article does not explain well the goal of ISO 19770. It point too much on the TagVault company and the commercial part of ISO 19770. Some section need to be split : explain the standard, history, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Efficks (talk • contribs) 01:57, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Made revisions including explaining the goal of ISO 19770, and updating the content to reflect the content from the actual standards (whether published or under development). Pberuk (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason for mentioning the names of the convenor and secretary of the Working Group? Adding such information means this Wiki page will be outdated as soon as one of these individuals step down. To me, doing so would be only warranted if said persons have a Wikipedia page dedicated to them, which seems not be the case. As it is now, the article smells of a certain vanity of its author(s).171.33.134.77 (talk) 14:37, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Three vitally important things are not mentioned: - The standard is proprietary - that is, it is _not_ freely available. - Which patents does the standard rely on? Are the companies contributing required to license the patents they've created for this work freely for implementations of the standard? - Is it possible to provide open source implementations? That is, are there non-disclosure agreements or other terms and conditions that have to be signed in order to receive the specification which would prohibit open source implementations?

This article is highly promotional - basically an advertisement for the committee and its authors. IMHO, it clearly doesn't present a neutral point of view on the standard. AlanR (talk) 21:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll second the remarks about lack of NPOV. The convener seems to have added himself and the secretary to the article, listing their own LinkedIn pages and a link from his website as resources. I recommend reverting that edit. Jelleecat (talk) 04:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ISO/IEC 19770. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://digimindcenter.com/symantec/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150216123000/https://www.iaitam.org/eweb/startpage.aspx to https://www.iaitam.org/eweb/startpage.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ISO/IEC 19770. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: Too many to list, see edit summaries. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:31, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]