This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science articles
Comment: These are good sources for Basic Formal Ontology, but not for the ISO/IEC standard outlining it. You'd be better off creating subsections in top-level ontology and Basic Formal Ontology for the ISO/IEC standard. These articles are underdeveloped.We don't need a separate article on the standard itself if the standard is just defining a topic we have an article on already, and said standard hasn't had coverage independent of the topic. Office Open XML is an example of how this might be done. Chess (talk) (please use {{reply to|Chess}} on reply) 13:55, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: These are good sources for Basic Formal Ontology, but not for the ISO/IEC standard outlining it. You'd be better off creating subsections in top-level ontology and Basic Formal Ontology for the ISO/IEC standard. These articles are underdeveloped.We don't need a separate article on the standard itself if the standard is just defining a topic we have an article on already, and said standard hasn't had coverage independent of the topic. Office Open XML is an example of how this might be done. Chess (talk) (please use 