|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ISO 8601 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
|Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3|
|WikiProject Time||(Rated B-class, Top-importance)|
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot I. Any threads with no replies in 60 days may be automatically moved. Sections without timestamps are not archived.|
|Text and/or other creative content from ISO 8601 usage was copied or moved into ISO 8601 with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:ISO 8601 usage.|
Some people have proposed using ISO 8601 for Wikipedia dates. For more of this discussion, see Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (dates and numbers).
- It appears that it's rapidly becoming a de facto standard (if not yet de jure) at least for dates in Wikipedia citations.
hhmm zone offset out of spec?
The section on time zone designators suggest ISO 8601 allows an offset without a colon:
After reviewing the ISO 8601-2 pdf, it appears that this may not be allowed. Section C.1.3.2 says:
"Zone-offset may be omitted or included. Time zone designation consists of either a 'Z' to indicate UTC, or a '+' or '-' to indicate "ahead of UTC" or "behind UTC", followed by a 2-digit hour, followed optionally by a colon and the 2-digit minutes."
Many implementations of ISO 8601 seem to allow the colon to be omitted, but maybe this is a common misconception. Can anyone cite where the hhmm offset came from? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 19:07, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
- a) You refer to the draft, not accepted standard. b) You refer to the extended profile, not basic.
- See 4.2.1 ISO/WD 8601-1 pdf
Great! Thanks for providing the reference, section 18.104.22.168 explicitly shows hhmm offsets are allowed. I'd like to suggest linking the iso8601-1 pdf in the article so it is easier to find. 22.214.171.124 (talk) 17:51, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
A suggestion on ISO date format
Greetings, everybody, I don't know how to suggest this to the ISO, but I don't know how they missed it. The date format standardisation is yyyy-MM-dd, which is good for clearing the confusion between the dd-MM-yyyy and MM-dd-yyyy formats. But, as an Arabic speaker, it's very frustrating. Because of you typed it on computer, it shows in reverse, for the "-" is flexible to RTL and LTR directions, unlike other marks or the ".". And if I typed it the normal Arabic way it shows right, but it loses its sorting advantage. So I suggest the format yyyy.MM.dd for the mentioned reason and another one, it doesn't break at the end of a line. Best Regards Abu-Ghadeer ؛؛؛؛
AhmedAbuGhadeer (talk) 08:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- This talk page is for discussing how to improve this Wikipedia article. Suggestions for improving the standard are out of scope. I don't know how to suggest changes to the standard either. Jc3s5h (talk) 09:36, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
I came hear after reading some code that supposedly conformed with ISO 8601 but didn't support the 61st second on days that had them. After reading the draft it appears that this page is wrong. (Maybe older versions of the standard are different?) 126.96.36.199 (talk) 14:51, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- As it says in this article, "The standard does not assign any specific meaning to elements of the date/time to be represented; the meaning will depend on the context of its use." It's possible the code is representing some version of time that does not include leap seconds.