Talk:I Want Candy (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.

I made this movie

I made this movie. Every fact here is true. This is a low budget British movie from Ealing Studios which Buena Vista (ie Disney) have picked up and are treating like a major movie. I lean towards karma rather than dogma, but it seems a touch absurd that the only amendment that anyone can make is to append 'according to the press release' in relation to parts of the plot. I cannot post the Empire review because it hasn't come out yet. The trailer was premiered on Sun Online and garnered 100,000, a record for The Sun by a significant margin. Last night, we had a screening where 450 laughed so long and hard tghat they kept missing jokes. i just want to fit in. What do I do? Mynameispiers 21:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What you should do is clear off and spam a newsgroup instead. This is an encyclopedia, not a marketing channel. SpaceyHopper 21:14, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spacey man. I give in. you feel stronger than i. wikipedia guidelines rule, tho i have an increasingly uneasy feeling about the self appointed guardians of what is fair comment. you censors youtube, for instance? you at least have the good grace to show yourself, or at least your avatar. i am just a guy who's prepared to wear a chicken suit to promote his movie (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z196p-bpaoo).

You misunderstand; Wikipedia isn't a platform for comment, 'fair' or otherwise.SpaceyHopper 15:05, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge from Candy Fiveways

Please merge any relevant content from Candy Fiveways per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Fiveways. Thanks. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-11 05:10Z

Plagiarism

The content of this article has large portions which are exactly the same as on the official website. Would anyone like to reassure me this some how isn't plagiarised?--213.78.207.45 22:33, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

for some reason somebody placed random letters somewhere, i dont know if it is vandalism, but it would be nice if people didnt add this random stuff. Evildoctorbluetooth 13:24, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:I want candy.jpg

Image:I want candy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on I Want Candy (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:45, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]