This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
How could the authors of described Iberica if its not 2011 yet? --Taylor Reints 15:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DeinonychusDinosaur999 (talk • contribs)
I know...weird. My guess is the paper itself isn't published yet and some or all parts of it leaked out on the Internet. Crimsonraptor (talk) 16:38, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As with many journals now, Cretaceous Research releases the papers of the upcoming issue online prior to official print publication. Thus the article is available, but the official publication isn't until the print version is released in 2011. --Kevmin§ 07:15, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]