Talk:Idris Williams

Wales Low‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Politics and Government / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

Work in progress[edit]

The "Public life" section needs further work to support the lead section description of Williams, especially as he was only a councillor for the last two years of his life. For future use I've added a number of external links to information that could be incorporated in the text and there are further details in the biographical sketches currently cited. I will try to return to this article as time permits and hopefully other editors will find the links useful as well. RLO1729 (talk) 10:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the above. I have added an useful secondary source on the Rhondda which has a section on Williams, a neglected figure by historians perhaps. Will also try to do more work on this article when I have time. Macs15 (talk) 21:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good work and great to have a secondary source. I had wondered whether the article didn't quite meet the General notability guideline (secondary sources) just based on the newspaper articles. RLO1729 (talk) 01:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]