Talk:Iloprost

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Iloprost.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

when was this drug first formulated and found to be effective? FleetingJoy (talk) 03:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IV formulation

Will add some information on IV Iloprost and its use such as for Raynaud's phenomenon. 86.155.184.123 (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just like I promised. Will add more info re: its use and perform a clean up of the article as a whole. Panthro (talk) 05:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CAS number

The quoted CAS number is wrong. it is 78919-13-8 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.36.117.138 (talk) 08:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, both resolve to iloprost in eMolecules. I've added 78919-13-8 to the article. Thanks, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frequency of dosage

Does "The approved dosing regimen ... is 6 to 9 times daily (no more than every 2 hours) during waking hours" mean the interval is to be (2 hours or less) or than that no more doses are to be given within 2 hours ie interval is (2 hours or more)?--SilasW (talk) 08:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iloprost. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060602082050/http://www.fda.gov:80/cder/drug/InfoSheets/patient/iloprostPIS.htm to http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/InfoSheets/patient/iloprostPIS.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]