Jump to content

Talk:Indigenous peoples in Argentina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

56% the of Argentines of origin amerindian

[edit]
The article reads: about 56% the of Argentines of origin amerindian. This appointment arose from a misinterpretation of the article in the daily Clarin. The study by Dr. Corach and Silvina Heguy on which it relied to write your article never gets to that conclusion.
The study analyzed 100 samples of southern Argentina, 220 samples from the north to center. If we take an average of these 320 samples to obtain 56% (actually 58%) contained genes Amerindians. As you have noticed, not taken into account that more than half the population is in the center of the country, so that 56% does not refer to the people of Argentina, but the average among these 3 groups of samples. Clarin however, decided to exaggerate by saying that 56% of Argentines have Native American genes; drawing their own conclusions when the study's findings did not say that.
The percentage of Native American descendants of Argentina would have analyzed a number of samples proportional to population density in each sector of the country. So most of the samples have come from the most populated cities (mostly in the Midwest) and Buenos Aires, Rosario, Mendoza, Santa Fe, etc. Something like 200 samples from the center of the country, 70 northern and 30 south.
I found an article more seriously, that is about the same study. This can clearly see that at no time conlusión reaches 56%: [1].Ccrazymann (talk) 17:49, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The map is very wrong

[edit]

Huarpes got globalized in the XVIII century, they all mixed with the spanish. There are no Huarpes left and the map is just a lie. See http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huarpe 190.226.25.238 (talk) 14:03, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm no expert on the remaining scattered locations of the few indigenous peoples left in Argentina after La Conquista del Desierto, but the map suggests the Falklands are part of Argentina. They are not. And even if there is some disagreement on this point, it might as well be left off anyway, as there has never been an indigenous population on the Falklands Islands. --Vinadanimex (talk) 01:40, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Agree I was just coming to the talk page to comment on this map. Bearing in mind that the issue of the Falklands is a sensitive one, we still have to stick to what is factually accurate. There was no indigenous population of the Islands prior to the arrival of the Europeans and no archaeological remains have ever been discovered of prior habitation, so it cannot be associated with any indigenous population in Argentina. Therefore, to include it in the map is not factually accurate and implies a political message that does not belong in this particular article. Walker Slake (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Indigenous peoples in Argentina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indigenous peoples in Argentina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Social Studies

[edit]

Devine weeks 190.108.214.200 (talk) 21:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Indigenous_peoples_in_Argentina&oldid=1207711955"