Talk:Infant Potty Training
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Infant Potty Training vs Elimination communication
[edit]This article really should contrast and compare this to "Elimination communication". Is there any real difference between the two? This sounds a lot like the "Elimination communication" to me, with maybe a few keys differences. --Cab88 (talk) 17:31, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- Have to agree, there doesn't appear to be anything of a pronounced difference here with EC but I'm not an expert on either. Also this needs rewriting to be less of an infomercial. Pbhj (talk) 21:16, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
- OK having a quick hack at it, posting some excerpts removed here --- actually having tries briefly I need to look up how to ask for removal, it really a priori has nothing to add that isn't marketing. Pbhj (talk) 22:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Infant Potty Training. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140104053021/http://ecsimplified.com/elimination-communication-101/ to http://ecsimplified.com/elimination-communication-101/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)