Talk:Infrastructure Client Group
Appearance
![]() | A fact from Infrastructure Client Group appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 June 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help! | ![]() |
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
( )
- ... that members of the Infrastructure Client Group account for 40% of all spending on infrastructure in the United Kingdom? " the UK’s Infrastructure Client Group (ICG) which represents more than 40% of annual UK infrastructure spending." from: "Digital maturity snapshot reveals where industry needs to go next". Infrastructure Intelligence. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
- ALT1:... that the Infrastructure Client Group helped to develop the British construction industry guidelines for works continuing during the coronavirus pandemic? "Representatives from the Constriction Leadership Council, Infrastructure Client Group and the sector’s main trade federations are collaborating to develop guidance for industry" from: "COVID-19: construction briefing – 24 March". Construction News. 24 March 2020. Retrieved 19 April 2020.
Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 16:21, 2 May 2020 (UTC).
Article is long enough (2962 characters), new enough (moved to mainspace on 2 May, nominated same day), and article is within policy
Both hooks are short enough, interesting enough (it's an article about construction group, these are the most interesting hooks there), within policy, and well cited
QPQ done
Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)