Talk:Inglesbatch

Climate section

Is it really appropriate for an article on a hamlet to have a "Climate" section, especially as it is identical in text to "Climate" sections of many towns in Somerset, and the climate in the hamlet is no different to that of the parish in which it lies or the city to which it is adjacent? --Pontificalibus (talk) 15:14, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also somewhat concerned that the text refereed to above has been copied amongst many articles without proper attribution. I wonder who wrote it originally? --Pontificalibus (talk) 15:16, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with attribution was highlighted recently on the FAC of the Somerset Levels when it was identified as being "close paraphrasing" on the met office source. I therefore rewrote the paragraph and put it into the 40 or so articles where it is presented. I was unable to work out who wrote it or where it was first used. We should be using Template:Copied on the talk page of articles where we are copying text from one wikipedia article to another.— Rod ^talk 15:22, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Parish

Isn't it in Englishcombe parish, not Priston? See map on page 7 of this.--Pontificalibus (talk) 17:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are probably right - I think that error was probably my misreading of a local parish map. We should change this in the lead & I would then advocate merging into Englishcombe.— Rod ^talk 17:25, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have changed the prose. However, the merger proposal still remains on Priston's talk page. Jaguar (talk) 17:27, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've now removed the merge banner as the article might survive AfD.— Rod ^talk 18:21, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inglesbatch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100803025534/http://www.bath.org/hotel/corner.htm to http://www.bath.org/hotel/corner.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]