Talk:Insitu

United States: Military history / Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Insitu wins STUAS

{{request edit}} I think the following is reasonable to add in, as this was a very long-running and notable contract.

On July 30, 2010 it was reported that Insitu won the STUAS Tier II contract with its Integrator product.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://blog.seattlepi.com/aerospace/archives/216261.asp?from=blog_last3|title=Boeing subsidiary Insitu wins Navy unmanned aircraft deal|publisher=Seattle PI}}</ref> The contract was estimated to offer the potential for over $0.5 billion in orders beginning in 2013.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.defense-update.com/newscast/0810/insitu_stuas_02082010.html|title=InSitu Selected for STUAS UAV Program, Potential Future Orders: Over $0.5 Billion|publisher=Defense Update}}</ref>

Naturally, feel free to modify my wording or anything. I wrote this in about 5-10 minutes and it could probably be written better. --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 15:09, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done for now: Looks good enough, cited and all, however, where would you like this to be placed in the article? ℳono 05:34, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Chzz ► 05:44, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested edit

{{request edit}} It's not MQ-21. It's RQ-21A, and here's a source: http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=defense&id=news/asd/2011/08/17/02.xml --Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 16:08, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thank you. Zidanie5 (talk) 03:58, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]