Talk:Interstate 95 in South Carolina

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States: South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

U.S. Roads: Interstates / South Carolina Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	Interstate Highways
Locations	South Carolina
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Exit 1 in NC

@Dough4872 and Washuotaku: before this gets out of hand, it's fine if both articles list NC's exit 1 since the interchange is on the state line. It's not worth an edit war. –Fredddie ™ 04:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, if an intersection or interchange is on a state line, it should be listed in both state-detail pages. For example, the Pennsylvania Route 163 interchange on the Maryland/Pennsylvania border is in both the Interstate 81 in Maryland and Interstate 81 in Pennsylvania articles and the Route 54 (Delaware–Maryland) intersection is in both the U.S. Route 13 in Maryland and U.S. Route 13 in Delaware articles. Dough 48 72 04:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree with that because overall the exit is in North Carolina and is maintained by NCDOT (including the ramps into SC). It is the same as how I treat bridges or roads that intersect at county lines, it is maintained by one or the other because typically it is never 50-50. I believe it should be mentioned, but not highlighted in the junction list. However, despite my disagreement, I will restrain myself since my opinion may not reflect with a majority of others. --WashuOtaku (talk) 13:28, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Doug and Freddie on this, but should we mention the fact that NCDOT is in charge of maintenance in spite of the fact that the ramps cross the NC/SC line? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 15:22, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that's nitpicking on details now and hopefully not something you want to inject into the Junction list. This would also not be the first time another state covered a highway section past their borders. --WashuOtaku (talk) 18:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that adding a note about NCDOT maintenance is overkill. –Fredddie ™ 00:48, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I can live with that. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 01:30, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Exit 5 destinations

Several months ago, an anonymous IP added Estill, South Carolina and Savannah, Georgia as destinations at Exit 5, and C.Fred (talk · contribs) reverted these edits. It should be noted that signs approaching Exit 5 northbound do include Hardeeville and Estill, and the ones going south do include Hardeeville and Savannah. So in this case, the anonymous IP is right. I don't have pics, but I know that AARoads does. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 17:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Google Maps street view images have them also. It's worth noting that the signs in Google Maps use Clearview, so they are relatively recent signs.

The edit by the IP matched the patterns of a malicious editor, who had been making a number of changes (including spelling NORTH and SOUTH in all caps. The destinations may be a baby that got tossed with that bathwater. —C.Fred (talk) 18:26, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I suspected that might be the case, judging by the history. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary exits around Coosawhatchie?

"By 1975, Interstate 95 was open continuously from US 17, in Hardeeville, to SC 63, in Walterboro; temporary exits were removed around Coosawhatchie."

Any info on those temporary exits? ---------User:DanTD (talk) 03:29, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

They may exist in the old state maps around that time. --WashuOtaku (talk) 03:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I was just looking for some of those old state maps online, and I can't find anything on them. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 17:56, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 95 in South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131110173329/http://www.gardenclubofsc.org/projects/bluestarmarkers/default.htm to http://www.gardenclubofsc.org/projects/bluestarmarkers/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:46, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exit 153

According to this;

"Between 1998 and 2000, exit 153, Honda Way, was added."

However, I personally remember seeing it fully constructed in May 1999. So I suppose the next project is finding the exact date. ---------User:DanTD (talk) 11:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]