Talk:Intrusion detection system
|This article is the subject of an educational assignment supported by Wikipedia Ambassadors through the India Education Program.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
IDS stans for intrustion detection system. This section needs to be cleaned up. It should not just be a list of terms. One suggestion would be to integrate this terminology into the other sections. --18.104.22.168 (talk) 05:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)--22.214.171.124 (talk) 05:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
I've fleshed out the IDS evasion section - and since it was about the same size as the rest of the IDS section, I put it on its own page. The 'IDS Evasion with Unicode' link is also on the new page. --Sgorton 21:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Merge with NIDS
While it's good that there’s a separate article on the network-side of IDS, I don't think its worthy of its own page (especially seeing how small the NIDS page is, 3 paragraphs). Since NIDS is the networking part of IDS, and we have this page on IDS, I believe we should incorporate the NIDS page into this one as its own section, and have a redirect from NIDS to here. Ghostalker 21:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- I tagged the articles appropriately. I'm neutral on the merge. -- intgr 21:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
I agree with the merge proposals. -- Rama
- I also agree with the merge proposal --Sgorton 18:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Not all intrusion detection systems are network-based. There are also host-based intrusion detection systems. For that reason, if they are merged, you need to be clear to which kind you're refering. KD 18:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
I would suggest only merging the NIDS if you're going to merge all major types (e.g. Network-based, Host-based, Application-based, Signature-based, Statistical Anomoly-based) of IDS into this article--otherwise, it makes more sense to have separate pages and links. (User mmh6577)
I concur with mmh6577. We'd be better off expanding the NIDS page, e.g. moving there all the network-related stuff, and linking properly here all the content for Host IDS, etc. Mauro Cicognini 15:06, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I enjoyed a clear definition of nids on a separate page. If merge pages, please let nids as a clearly marked chapter.
NIDS and HIDS are two subsections of IDS and as such should be separate chapters.
1. IDS - 2 basic types:
A. NIDS (Network based) B. HIDS (Host based)
I dont approve of merging the NIDS article to preserve the hierarchy & the structure of the main article the "IDS" if u want to merge the "NIDS" u'll have to add the other articles "PIDS" , "APIDS" to the main one. Marco C.
- I think it will be better to leave them as it it is and let IDS point to NIDS as there is a relation.
I am also against merging. I think the current IDS page should define the fundamentals on how it works and keep the more in-depth explanation to the respective pages (NIDS/HIPS/etc). Breadtk (talk) 20:46, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia IDS page example
Hello, you can see what is done on the french version of this similar page: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syst%C3%A8me_de_d%C3%A9tection_d%27intrusion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Toady (talk • contribs) 15:41, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
I find the analogies of firewall = locks, ids = burglar alarm quite useful. Is it worth adding this in somewhere? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Segrub (talk • contribs) 09:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
intrusion detection or intrusion-detection?
- IMHO, the correct term is without the "-"; at least that's the way I've seen it in most sources (eg: NIST 800-series guide). Regards, DPdH (talk) 16:19, 2 September 2009 (UTC)