Jump to content

Talk:Inuit Ataqatigiit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move

[edit]

Should this not be at Inuit Community? See, for instance Christian Social Union not Christlich-Soziale Union AndrewRT - Talk 00:39, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Generally, articles should be at English names. However, if a party is more known by its native name, it could be used (Herri Batasuna, Sinn Fein, etc.). I think in the case of the Greenlandic parties original names should be used, as the translations are a bit strange in English. Also, I'm not 100% sure that the widely circulated English translations are necessarily correct interpretations of Greenlandic. --Soman 13:34, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

translation

[edit]

I've seen at least four, different translations or "commonly known as..." in various sources. The Australian says Inuit Community or IA. Reuters says Eskimo Brotherhood. BBC News says Community of the People or IA. Euronews says Inuit or Eskimo Brotherhood. Xinhua News Agency says IA. Currently, the article's first sentence states (Greenlandic for Community of the People), but uses the term Inuit Community in the third paragraph. In order to avoid confusion (maybe I'm the only one confused, ha), can someone clarify the commonly used names/abbreviation. It would be helpful to add/bold them in the lede. Thanks. APK lives in a very, very Mad World 05:28, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ideology

[edit]

Can I point out that independence is a goal, as indeed would be unification with XYZ if there had been a plan to open the borders of the full sovereign body; but it is not a political ideology. Ideologies refer to the beliefs adopted by the party, such as liberalism, Christian democracy, conservatism, social democracy, democratic socialism, left-wing nationalism, communism/marxism etc. Independence is not a creed, any more than the plain simple term "democracy" itself. But I agree that it is important to list it otherwise it could easily mislead readers into assuming that by being an active party, it accepts the status quo of Denmark's sovereignty. Does anyone agree that independence should be parenthesised with a sidenote? Evlekis (talk) 12:20, 5 June 2009 (UTC) Blocked sock:Evlekis.[reply]

I would prefer separatism with the link going to Greenlandic independence, as separatism is an ideology and Greenlandic independence the Greenlandic form of it. Euroscepticism should be removed as Greenland is neither in Europe, nor in the EU. Its not an issue in Greenlandic politics and therefore not part of the current party ideology.--Batmacumba (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inuit Ataqatigiit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inuit Ataqatigiit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Inuit Ataqatigiit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:11, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Greenlandic"

[edit]

The qualifier Greenlandic seats in the table seems superfluous. Under Plaid Cymru#Electoral_performance its just taken for granted they compete for the Welsh 36 seats and not mentioned explicitly. If the number is two the reader will now its the Greenlandic seats.--Batmacumba (talk) 08:52, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does everyone know how the greenlandic-danish system works? --Agiotagegeniophobiafarris (talk) 06:40, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Left wing

[edit]

IA is de facto centre-left these days and a very pragmatic party. The reference to it being left wing is from 1999. We should try to find a more current source that could place them accurately.--Batmacumba (talk) 09:00, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source municipality seats

[edit]

What is the source for how many seats the party has in the municipalities? I couldn't find any, but I may hope it's not as simple as 81/100*36,9 (excluding the losing party) because a portion of the seats is pre-allocated. --Agiotagegeniophobiafarris (talk) 06:48, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:00, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Inuit_Ataqatigiit&oldid=1207730667"