|WikiProject Statistics||(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)|
- This is because it is not yet written. Please go ahead writing it if you are capable :-) — fnielsen (talk) 11:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Inverse-Wishart distribution for p=1
See Section The parametriztion for p=1 is not correct. In relation to the inverted gamma distribution it should say α=(m+1)/2, β is correct Can anybody verify that?
There appears to be more than one parametrization for the inverse Wishart (and presumably the Wishart), making known results mutually unintelligible. Is there a mapping somewhere between them all? Shabbychef (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2013 (UTC)