Talk:Ipswich River

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.

Rivers Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Massachusetts may be able to help!

Lynnfield

The Ipswich River forms the border between Lynnfield and North Reading. Should Lynnfield be included in the list of towns through which the river flows? Capt3 (talk) 00:14, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

The refs are not too substantial. Raw url's are generally not the WP way. One link is dead. The others are not encyclopedic. Perhaps a little expansion citing books and articles is warranted.Branigan 07:56, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

PS: the refs use a different system from most articles. It may have been created on early WP. I like it, but its main feature is that the references are actually below in the notes section, and not up above in the text. The disadvantage is lack of portability. You can't move material around without paying attention to moving the notes as well. If you have some discussion mention it now. Otherwise I am inclined to convert it to the usual system.Branigan 03:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ipswich River. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/66gupqQDM?url=http%3A%2F%2Fviewer.nationalmap.gov%2Fviewer%2F to http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple day float trip.

I've been wanting to flat the ipswich river for some time now... Just Haven't had the time to put in the research.

 Any advice, experiences, and/or additional helpful suggestions or Tips, will be greatly appreciated. ToddONe (talk) 02:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]