Talk:Janadas Devan

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

something to add: http://www.asiaone.com/News/Latest%2BNews/Story/A1Story20071109-35491.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by MatchStickEleven (talk • contribs) 16:21, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the sentence "The impact the article had on the Singaporean blogosphere is enormous." I guess that can be considered a bad sentence. I have also deleted the sentence "This time, the point-by-point rebuttal of her letter was entirely handled by various Singaporean bloggers". "to try" was removed from the sentence "Ms Yvonne Lee Ching Ling, an Assistant Professor in Law at NUS, wrote a letter[1] to the Straits Times to try to rebut Mr Devan's article."

I hope that'll make this paragraph more wiki-friendly. I'm now removing the weasel and tone warnings from the paragraph. MatchStickEleven (talk) 14:35, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As for paragraph "377A debate and the rewriting of pluralism"

"shot to fame among Singaporean bloggers for an" was deleted from the sentence "October 27 2007, Mr Devan shot to fame among Singaporean bloggers for an article he wrote in the Straits Times titled "377A debate and the rewriting of pluralism" ".

"And arguably, her most controversial " was replaced with "A Controversial". "Arguably" is defined as a weasel word by wikipedia. The sentence "Being a government owned newspaper, it usually praises whatever policy the government decides to pursue." has been deleted.

I will now remove the "tone" warning. MatchStickEleven (talk) 14:34, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Janadas Devan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]