Talk:Jayne Mansfield's Pink Palace

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Way more stuff

[news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1917&dat=19600425&id=czQrAAAAIBAJ&sjid=CooFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2458,3795849] - More on the Pink Palace
Los Angeles Magazine 01, Los Angeles Magazine 02
Haunted Pink Palace: Haunted Hollywood...
Style: Glitter Stucco & Dumpster Diving
Evaluation of upholstered furniture
Demolition: NY Times, Contact Music, Rubble (snippet view).
Hollywood.com

Maybe a bit more on the "Red Office" can be found. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 04:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Cass-Eliott-lived-here dispute

An early revision adds that Cass Elliot was a subsequent owner of the Pink Palace, attributing this claim to this Web bio (more particularly, here.) However, in this revision, the claim and the attribution are removed. The next revision - three hours later! - undoes this edit because the previous editor did not supply a source.

More recently, an editor removed Cass Elliot again, citing the main Jayne Mansfield article, but not citing an external source. The next revision undoes this edit again, adding the comment that the dispute "needs a bit more elaboration, better a discussion."

In this connection, consider that, in her lifetime, Cass Elliot was well-known for living in Natalie Wood's former house in Laurel Canyon (see especially here; also here, and here.) Indeed, this star-map site observes that this was Elliot's residence at the time of her death, while on tour.

While Cass Elliot might have owned both the Jayne Mansfield house and the Natalie Wood house, it seems exceptionally odd that reports concerning the one fail to mention the other. Elliot's association with latter can be backed-up with photographs and contemporary reports; I have yet to encounter either as concerns the former.

In view of these considerations, and in consideration of Wikipedia's injunction to 'be bold', I have removed mention of Cass Elliot in the article proper. Perhaps editors who would revert this change would be so kind as first to review the external resources, above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.71.74.199 (talk) 00:18, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]