Talk:Jessica Carew Kraft

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (the author is the first female to publish a well-received book on rewilding and anarchism from a top-tier press) --Notinetwork (talk) 03:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it's all factual --2605:59C8:220C:BE10:30B4:D950:D4D2:F3EB (talk) 03:45, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not tagged as a hoax; it tagged for failure to demonstrate significance or importance of the subject. —C.Fred (talk) 03:46, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the book is filled with citation backed factual information from a credited source --2601:200:4583:C4A0:C064:8B02:BF1B:A474 (talk) 03:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any independent sources? The only source that isn't full-on primary is an interview with her. —C.Fred (talk) 03:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I poked around a bit on Google and there seems to be genuine recent regional coverage of her related to her 2023 book (just googling her name brings up a few links of such). Whether that's enough for WP:GNG and surviving AfD is another question, but maybe that's enough to un-speedy. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 04:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2601:200:4583:C4A0:C064:8B02:BF1B:A474 Agreed. 93.7.178.33 (talk) 23:41, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review of issues shown by templates

At best, the article hangs by a thread on all the concerns noted, with the thinnest thread being notability. The true independent, secondary coverage of the subject, Jessica Carew Kraft, is narrow in numbers, depth and time period. The article still mostly cites directly or indirectly to the subject's work, and it's generally hard to tell what coverage is genuinely independent from the subject, with just a couple exceptions. I think there should be generally more effort to address all the templates, to get to a point where none of the concerns are fuzzy. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I apologize if my reverting edit summary seemed harsh. I was thinking in terms of what has changed since I last looked at the article, and there seemed to be nothing significantly changed. Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 05:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]