Talk:John Frank Clark

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

I re-did the article, it should not be considered a stub anymore. That was assigned the first 24 hours when the article was small and lacking secondary and tertiary references. Caboclo1 (talk) 03:43, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Caboclo1[reply]

This whole page is completely ridiculous. It is totally biased and embarrassingly fawning. It is in no way written with a "neutral point of view", as required by Wikipedia standards. It is way too long and contains trivial information. I'm nominating it as an Article for Deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.34.59.85 (talk) 05:35, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have now edited the article to make it neutral and to cut out the dross. It now looks much more like a normal Wikipedia page. I added tags to indicate where citations are needed, where something must be clarified, and so on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.34.59.85 (talk) 18:55, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Frank Clark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:59, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]