Talk:Johnny & Clyde
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
A fact from Johnny & Clyde appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 Februaryย 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Feedback from New Page Review process
[edit]I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Please add some more reviews.
๐ณ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ 15:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by DirtyHarry991ย talkย 08:06, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that heist-horror film Johnny & Clyde has been called "unwatchable"? Source: Screen Rant "Johnny & Clyde Review: Overwrought & Undercooked Crime Thriller Is Unwatchable" [1]; Brian Orndorf, Blu-Ray.com, "Itโs an unwatchable mess, sure to be one of the worst films of 2023" [2]
5x expanded by Reidgregย (talk). Self-nominated at 19:45, 5 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Johnny & Clyde; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- Article new and long enough. Hook cited inline and verified in source. Earwig says clear, only marking a single short quotation. Generally well-referenced, and interesting hook. QPQ done so good to go. Juxlos (talk) 06:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Juxlos and Reidgreg: is blu-ray.com a reliable source? The Screen-Rant thing isn't usable per WP:HEADLINE for this hook, so if blu-ray works... theleekycauldron (talk โข she/her) 03:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Juxlos and Theleekycauldron: I'm not sure about Blu-ray.com itself, but author Brian Orndof is one of Rotten Tomatoes' "approved critics" and his reviews have appeared on a dozen internet outlets (author's review page on Rotten Tomatoes). โย Reidgreg (talk) 12:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- all right, i'll take thatย :) theleekycauldron (talk โข she/her) 08:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Juxlos and Theleekycauldron: I'm not sure about Blu-ray.com itself, but author Brian Orndof is one of Rotten Tomatoes' "approved critics" and his reviews have appeared on a dozen internet outlets (author's review page on Rotten Tomatoes). โย Reidgreg (talk) 12:51, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Juxlos and Reidgreg: is blu-ray.com a reliable source? The Screen-Rant thing isn't usable per WP:HEADLINE for this hook, so if blu-ray works... theleekycauldron (talk โข she/her) 03:37, 19 January 2024 (UTC)