Talk:Johnny Zacchara

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soap Operas, an effort to build consistent guidelines for and improve articles about soap operas and telenovelas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit WikiProject Soap Operas, where you can join the project and/or the discussion.Soap OperasWikipedia:WikiProject Soap OperasTemplate:WikiProject Soap Operassoap opera articles

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

I just want to remind everyone that ANYONE can edit this stuff.

Fair use rationale for Image:Johnny Zacchara Promotional Pic.jpg

Image:Johnny Zacchara Promotional Pic.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PLOT

This article has been trimmed per WP:PLOT. Plot sections like the one before my edits are just not encyclopedic or fitting for this project. A ni Mate 07:36, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kate/Connie's name

Enough with the reverts. Please discuss here instead. Infobox standards suggest the commonname to be listed in the infobox to avoid clutter. That would be Kate Howard. If there is consensus to use Connie, I don't see how "Connie Zaccharra" can exist - the person legally changed her name to Kate Howard. Connie referring to herself as Mrs. Zacchara, etc. is a current in-universe aspect, and unnecessary distinction for the infobox. I also trust AniMate's revert, as an admin. My vandalism comment was due to the fact this is a repeated issue, without edit summaries, and disruptive. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 04:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with just using Kate Howard.Caringtype1 (talk) 04:49, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Johnny Zacchara. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]