Talk:Jordi Borràs i Abelló

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because there is no justification for the speedy deletion. Talk page has not been used at any time by the nominator to try to solve the issue. --Filiprino (talk) 15:39, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Bringing here a discussion that RichardWeiss started in my talk page. Sources stating that Societat Civil Catalana is a unionist organization appear in the first line of its own article. There is no need to add a reference that SCC is unionist if those references are included in its own article and it's an undisputed fact. Few weeks ago, when you made several edits in several articles removing this kind of information, you were required (here) to explain the reasoning of those removals. You just ignored that discussion and didn't answer the questions. That's why I proceeded with the revert. Please, if you have no prove that the position of SCC in the independence issue is disputed or can't explain why you think that information is not relevant in this article, I will have to ask you to add that information again. --Aljullu (talk) 10:35, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If I demand a source you need to provide it to the article or not add the addition. There is nothing to discuss which is why I posted on your talk page and not here. Don't invent policies as justification for your claim that we don't need to reference with high-quality sources any information you add, when challenged. ♫ RichardWeiss talk contribs 11:12, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]