Talk:Joseph Ellison

Joseph Ellison has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 24, 2022. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Maritime / British / European / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Joseph Ellison/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 05:16, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comment

I plan to review this for GA class. It's late now, so I will get to it later. I will comment about one thing. See below. Djmaschek (talk) 05:16, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

American Revolutionary War, paragraph 1: "It was decided however that he should stay with the barge in case the army needed to retreat back to the coast." The word "coast" is wrong here. Charleston and Bunker Hill were across the harbor from Boston. If the army retreated, it would have retreated across the harbor to Boston. See the maps at the Battle of Bunker Hill article.

Done removed "to the coast".

Review 1

The article passes GA review (with flying colors). Usually, I find typos and other minor issues, but this time I don't see any. Djmaschek (talk) 04:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well-written: ✓ Pass
Verifiable: ✓ Pass
Broad in its coverage: ✓ Pass
Neutral: ✓ Pass
Stable: ✓ Pass
Illustrated: ✓ Pass