Talk:Judges' Trial

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War II task force

Start class

A great start. Use footnotes to tie references to facts in the article. Also, should have a lead paragraph that is only a few sentences, then start going into details. Aboutmovies 19:23, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Wording

"All convicts were found guilty on all charges brought before them." Isn't this axiomatic? Of course all convicts were found quilty or they wouldn't be convicts. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.211.90.75 (talk) 16:38, 24 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

No. One convict was found guilty of only a subset of the charges. Lupo 22:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 11:14, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Names of German judges

The article should at least state which judges were tried and convicted. Also added should be the length of the terms they actually served and for what reason. --AdeleivdVelden (talk) 10:01, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the article at all? It does. Here: Judges' Trial#Defendants Lupo 22:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reference wrong

I am sorry, but one of the references is wrong. It is not about judge Hagemann but about a man named Kusch. There is nothing about Hagemann at that website. --13Peewit (talk) 21:39, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there is one sentence about Hagemann at that page. But the reference is still wrong; the cases of Oskar Kusch and of Karl-Heinrich Hagemann (born April 8, 1908) have nothing to do with the Judges' Trial. Hagemann was the German military judge who had sentenced Kusch to death; after the war, Hagemann stood trial for this before a German jury at Kiel, Germany. See de:Oskar Kusch, or directly Walle, Heinrich: Die Tragödie des Oberleutnants zur See Oskar Kusch, Franz Steiner Verlag 1995, ISBN 3515068414. (In German.) Anyway, I've removed that spurious reference. Lupo 22:58, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Judges' Trial. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060207171413/http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/Alstoetter.htm to http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/nuremberg/Alstoetter.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]