Jump to content

Talk:KDE Software Compilation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fifth series

[edit]

Due to the decision to diverge into KDE Frameworks, Plasma Next and KDE Applications, there ain't no "fifth series". Probably due to lack of manpower, only KDE Frameworks and Plasma Next are going to be based on Qt 5. Releases of "KDE Applications" remain to be based on Qt 4. Quoting http://dot.kde.org/2013/09/04/kde-release-structure-evolves :"There is currently (as of 2013-09-04) no concrete plan for porting KDE Applications to KDE Frameworks 5, although some teams have started experimenting with this. A full scale move to Frameworks 5 is not expected until the new Frameworks and Plasma platforms are ready. Users can rely on at least 2 more releases of KDE Applications with the current underlying 4.x technologies." The question is, how to document this divergence in the Wikipedia. I suggest to stop writing about "fifth series" and move to "post-forth series" and to distinguish between Qt4 and Qt5-based software. I have added two more columns to the table at: Releases User:ScotXWt@lk 12:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could this article be split / better targeted, please?

[edit]

I got to this article as a redirect from 'kde applications' (breadcrumb 'kde framework') - to the top, no less. Could (a) the redirect be better focused to the appropriate spot within the article? 'kde applications' is also referenced within the article, however clicking on it brings one back to the top of this same article, making it a circular (and annoying) reference. So (b) could the article be split out with kde applications getting its own page? Reference the 'kde framework' article in the sense of nicely constraining that topic - was looking for a similarly scoped article for kde applications. This current article nicely contains the kde framework reference to show its place within the current kde ecosystem / framework of this entire article - could the same be done for kde applications, please? BS (talk) 19:09, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect KDE Software Compilation -> KDE Software Compilation 4

[edit]

Since "KDE SC" was only ever used during the "KDE4" series prior to the complete rebranding of the post-4-series, the info about KDE SC would expected to be identical to what is described in detail under "KDE Software Compilation 4". For the more general History of "KDE Software", there is now a page that bascially covers all broader topics that the current "KDE Software Compilation" article was formerly covering as well. Therefore a redirect to "KDE Software Compilation 4" would reduce redundancy while more accurately describing the "KDE SC 4" in detail and following historic and current releases at "KDE Software". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.175.93.31 (talk) 11:16, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on KDE Software Compilation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:34, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]