Jump to content

Talk:KF Tirana in European football

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Friendlies

[edit]

I recognize most of the friendlies. The list is not sourced though and that's a problem. Unsourced content can be rightly challenged. Still, deleting all of them makes the article poor. How about keeping the friendlies after 1970 for now until sources for the older games are found? PoshteMorriKuq (talk) 13:28, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be really great to have the list of all international friendlies, and I am very interested in seing the old ones, however the other user needs to provide a source from where he is getting that information. I am afraid only the sourced content can stay in the article. FkpCascais (talk) 14:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
We have to also assume good faith though, especially after the fact that the user removed the challenged match now, and the info had never questioned before you did: and it had been here for a long time. Not everything is sourced in wiki, and we can find a middle way here. Still, I look fwd to Fjorilda's comment. She has contributed since 2010 to the Tirana pages. I am looking for online sources, and they are extremely hard to find. I believe Fjorilda may have personal databases of games, which she has carefully collected over time. For the match in question against Red Star: I believe there may have been a game between Tirana and a Serbian team in 1938, but it wasn't for sure Red Star; it may have been another team of temporary Belgrade: SK Jugoslavija, BSK Belgrade, or perhaps some other team from outside Belgrade, still I remember having read something for a Serbian team coming and playing a friendly in Tirana in the 1930s. However if no sources are available for that game, better if the info stays out of wiki. PoshteMorriKuq (talk) 16:10, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it may have been, but Wikipedia rules demand content to be sourced. Otherwise, if the information is wrong or made up, we have the risk to have that information being spread to other websites, etc. The other editor should really just say where did he get that information from. It shouldn't be that hard. Better to have less information but all correct, than a lot of information but some wrong and false. FkpCascais (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KF Tirana in European football. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:50, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]