Talk:Kachess Lake

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington (assessed as Low-importance).

Lakes

	Lakes portal Kachess Lake is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Image?

Perhaps this image would be useful? - J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 01:10, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lakes Keechelus, Kachess, and Cle Elum (left to right). Red line is I-90, Snoqualmie Pass at upper left corner.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kachess Lake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070430182621/http://www.usbr.gov/dataweb/html/yakima.html to http://www.usbr.gov/dataweb/html/yakima.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:44, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Content Needed?

Controversary around Kachess Lake has grown substantially in recent years because of a proposal to install diesel pumps to pump natural lake water out of the lake to increase the allotment of water to proratable water rights holders in Yakima Valley during drought years. See https://www.usbr.gov/pn/programs/eis/kdrpp/index.html. Because pumping will need to be maintained continually while the lake level is below the dam outlet, it will need to continue throughout the year to avoid dewatering downstream. A number of environmental groups (including the Sierra Club), property owners, the local fire district and people who use the lake and it's surrounds for recreation (hiking, boating and camping) have expressed concerns include the potential extirpation of fish and local wildlife populations, loss of recreational benefits and property value decreases (impact on wells, access to lake and view), and reduced access to lake water for firefighting purposes. I have already done a relatively minor edit to clarify that the dam already impounds a substantial amount of water from the original pre-dam lake and that it was intended to utilize the full capacity of the lake's available watershed. More content that both described the Bureau of Reclamation's "Drought Relief Pumping Plant" and the opposing viewpoints regarding the plan seems warranted.

I would be happy to compose that additional content, but I have only limited Wikipedia experience, so I am seeking guidance on the best way to proceed. (Since I do not have a profile available to you, I'll share that my educational background is in History and Physical Sciences with graduate studies in History of Science and I have been in a technical leadership role in software engineering for over 30 years. While I am also a property owner at the lake, I would, of course, ensure that the additional content is balanced and neutral in tone.) Looking forward to your more expert guidance.

--EJSheldon (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]