Talk:Karl-Heinz Steffens

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Needs to be written in a more Encyclopediac way[edit]

I did some minor copy edits. Could use more.--Malerooster (talk) 00:50, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Karl-Heinz Steffens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Improper hagiographic tone[edit]

This comment is especially directed to 'Office Karl-Heinz Steffens', whose name implies that you are very closely/officially connected to Karl-Heinz Steffens. If that is the case, I must remind you that PR-like text is not appropriate to wikipedia. The purpose of wikipedia is to present 'just the facts' and not to be a PR-arm for any individual or organisation. I must also remind you of the standard disclaimer in such instances:

"...if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
"All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible." DJRafe (talk) 16:48, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]