Talk:Kathryn Scola

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ewilsed. Peer reviewers: AmeliaDM.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:37, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

Overall your article is strong, I like your inclusion of the more controversial side of her career and the context of the production code. Here are a few notes. You could combine the first two sentences so that the introduction flows better. You don't need to say that she was a screenwriter again in the third sentence. Instead you can say: “Scola worked in Hollywood for a multitude...”. In the CAREER section you should include something about how she started her career. In the sentence “...first attempted by Anita Loos...” do you mean she first wrote it? Be clearer. Your last paragraph could flow better. Right now you are just listing every film she wrote. Maybe you could just mention the most notable or controversial ones. It would be good to see some information on her personal life as well as what she did after her career. I think these details would make your article more informative and engaging. --AmeliaDM (talk) 18:11, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]