Talk:Katwijk aan Zee

	Netherlands portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
	This article is supported by Dutch municipalities task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

I propose editing this article for language and content. There seems to be a good deal of intermixing between the "Katwijk" page and the "Katwijk aan Zee" page, with most of the information about Zee found on the Katwijk page. This meant that the articles for Rijnsburg, Valkenburg and even Katwijk aan den Rijn were rather strong, but the article for Katwijk aan Zee quite weak. Any suggestions are welcome. For the time being I've deposited the Katwijk aan Zee information here. I'll turn to it shortly. Schildewaert (talk) 08:04, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've finished editing the article. I've not added to it substantially, but anyone interested in Katwijk aan Zee is welcome to add more. The article seems to have too much history in it and could perhaps be balanced out with a more modern overview of the beach resort. (Although I suppose most of that is at the Katwijk page.) I feel there was a tendency here to over-romanticise the fishing village aspect and to dwell on minor (and perhaps even dubious) points relating to dialect and religion. This is still in there but I toned it down a bit. I added a more flattering photo of the beach. There are other photos of Katwijk aan Zee in Wikimedia Commons, but the article is not long enough to include them all. If anyone wants to improve this article, please feel free. I'll keep an eye on it and edit any language problems. Schildewaert (talk) 08:51, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think Wikipedia could use a separate article on Brittenburg. Schildewaert (talk) 08:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should it not read: Christianised by English rather than British (ancient Britons(?))?

It reads:

The area was Christianised by British and Irish missionaries around the 9th century. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:411:1600:8012:EE22:A7D8:FA6F (talk) 02:08, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Katwijk aan Zee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081003030120/http://home-1.tiscali.nl/~dparlevl/historie/historieindex.htm to http://home-1.tiscali.nl/~dparlevl/historie/historieindex.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]