Talk:Kepler-9d

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Kepler-9d has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star Kepler-9d is part of the Kepler-9 series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
Date Process Result
March 21, 2011 Good article nominee Listed
May 11, 2011 Good topic candidate Promoted
Did You Know
Current status: Good article
WikiProject Astronomy (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon Kepler-9d is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kepler-9d/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 22:23, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:24, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria[edit]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Well written, I made a few minor copy-edits
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Sources check out, RS, no OR
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    AS much as is known at present about an object 650 parsecs away.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    None used, though images such as those in 9b & 9c would be good. Not a GA criteria.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    OK, good to go -careful taht you don't run out of exoplanets! :-) Jezhotwells (talk) 22:38, 21 March 2011 (UTC)