Jump to content

Talk:Kesgrave

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Racism

[edit]

I have removed all of the information on the racist accusations. This is because it is a recent internal matter which is not necessary in the article Clake92 (talk) 18:23, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was sourced, and reported in the wider media, which I'd assume makes it a notable incident; Really though, it should be treated in the same way as other villages to avoid any bias in either direction. -- Ratarsed (talk) 08:49, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CENSORSHIP IS A BAD THING, CHANGE THE TEXT BUT LEAVE THE SUBJECT ALONE —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reg lardez (talk • contribs) 10:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The entire section about the Route 66 bus and the racist comments made are completely irrelevant. Under the heading of Recent incidents is hardly the place for this minor news article that appeared over six months ago. It also dominates the article about Kesgrave The point made is pathetic as it would only effect local residents travelling from Kesgrave to Martlesham (5 minute journey?) during the morning rush hour and from Kesgrave to Ipswich during the evening rush hour. As this is the opposite direction to 99% of all bus users I cannot see how this is relevant. This fact alone would mean that the residents effected would be minimal. It has clearly been written by someone who views on race are; at best questionable and at worst pure racial hatred. Removal of this section does NOT constitue censorship. Can someone please give me a good reason why it should remain? If I do not receive any comments in the next few days I will remove the entire section. If the article is resubmitted after that then I will move to have the user banned from Wikipedia. 121translation (talk) 10:15, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is up to us in white communities to defend ourselves against intrusive politically correct councils, by whatever means, defending ones community against unfounded allegations is not questionable or racist. This page is also not your sole reserve you can if you want try to get this login banned, but it’s simple enough to set up another and continue unhindered. The story now is old news so will not be reinstated unless further accusations are made. Wikipedia was chosen because a number of sites that take feeds from it therefore promulgating the entry much further than an e-mail to Kesgrave news. Good luck in trying to stop us we are both motivated and organise….. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reg lardez (talk • contribs) 12:56, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal: Cedarwood Primary School

[edit]

I'm proposing that Cedarwood Primary School be merged into Kesgrave. The content in the Cedarwood article is very limited and would never survive an AfD. We can take the limited content that's notable and add it here with no problems. Any objections or opinions? Blue Square Thing (talk) 18:20, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger completed --Blue Square Thing (talk) 11:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Kesgrave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:22, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kesgrave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:01, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kesgrave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kesgrave&oldid=1207954943"