Talk:Khirbat Qumbaza

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

A village?

I can't find any evidence that Khirbat Qumbaza was actually a village. From contemporary maps, it does not look like one, and I don't have access to the sources provided in the article (not that there are any inline citations, so they're irrelevant anyway). I'd like clarification on the subject, since I'm writing on a related subject now which might need information about this village/site. —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 21:26, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, both Morris and Khalidi refer to it, so I will remove the tag as soon as I have added the rest of the information. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 02:00, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the new information is interesting. I'd still like to know more though: why isn't its population separate? Is it possible that it was actually a private estate and not a village? When exactly was it depopulated, and under what circumstances? From the information given in the article, it's still very difficult to understand what Khirbat Qumbaza really was. Again, contemporary British maps don't show this place as a village. —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 12:25, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Name

Every major source I have seen on the subject names this Khirbat Qumbaza (Ruins of Qumbaza), not Qumbaza. Why the article move? —Ynhockey ^(Talk) 13:54, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]