Talk:King's College Chapel, Cambridge

Architecture Top‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Cambridge

This article is within the scope of the University of Cambridge WikiProject, an attempt to improve articles relating to the University of Cambridge, and to standardize and extend the coverage of the University in the encyclopedia. If you would like to participate, you can help us by editing the article attached to this notice, or you could visit the project page, where you can join the project, learn more about it, see what needs to be done, or contribute to the discussion.University of CambridgeWikipedia:WikiProject University of CambridgeTemplate:WikiProject University of CambridgeUniversity of Cambridge articles

Tudor or gothic

In the Tudor architecture article, this chapel is cited as a fine example. But the lead paragraph of this article claims it is gothic. So ... Ancheta Wis 04:22, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The report of the Royal Commission of the Historic Monuments of England says the following (vol 1, p 105)

The Chapel, begun in 1446 by Henry VI, continued by Edward IV, Richard III and Henry VII, and completed under Henry VIII in 1515, is amongst our most important possessions. It is of great architectural interest, being one of the four most sumptious building of Royal foundation of the period. The fittings are outstanding by virtue of their quality and condition and their portrayal of the changes from the Gothic to the Renaissance style during the period they span. [...] The screen installed by Henry VIII between 1533 and 1536 is [...] the earliest timber structure of major size in the country entirely in the Renaissance style.

"Cambridge, a photographic collection" (photos by Pearce, text by Wallis) says (p 44)

[King's College Chapel] soars in Gothic splendour over the Backs' tranquil riverscape.

"Cambridge: The Hidden History" by Alison Taylor says (p101)

King's College chapel [was] almost archaic in style when it was finished.

Bluap 05:58, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The chapel is Tudor in the sense of having been built by the Tudors. It is Gothic in the sense that its architecture demonstrates the Perpendicular Gothic style, unique to England and also seen at Bath Abbey and Henry VI's Chapel at Westminster Abbey. The English kings could afford the finest craftsmen, so Italian and Flemish masters worked on the internal fittings, bringing there own style with them. Amandajm (talk) 16:07, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes

Somebody has edited this page, saying that "someone Chinese wrote a poem about King's College" and that the soloist at the beginning of Nine Lessons and Carols sung as a joke. The comment about choristers is also irrelevant. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.47.82.250 (talk) 14:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dedication

At no point does the article state what is this chapel's dedication.

208.87.248.162 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The College's page, speaking of the Chapel's history, states that "Henry [VI] was only 19 when he laid the first stone of the 'College roial of Oure Lady and Seynt Nicholas' in Cambridge on Passion Sunday, 1441."

208.87.248.162 (talk) 17:35, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sainte-Chapelle ?

[1] claims it is based on Sainte-Chapelle.

Is there any truth to this?

Hi Cagliost. A quick search on Google Books suggests that while there are parallels between between King's College Chapel and Sainte-Chapelle, there appears to be no reliable source suggesting that they are clearly connected in the way that, say, St. Stephen's Chapel, Westminster, (destroyed by fire in 1834), was designed to emulate and outdo Sainte-Chapelle.^[1] The Fodor guidebook might simply be inventing a connection that doesn't quite exist.

Reference:

^ John Steane (20 May 2003). The Archaeology of the Medieval English Monarchy. Routledge. p. 177. ISBN 978-1-134-64159-8.

—Waldhorn (talk) 19:08, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well no PHD here, but my two cents in there is a connection in the spirit of French Rayonnant and English Perpendicular Gothic styles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.240.242.225 (talk) 22:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's College Chapel, Cambridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110720005114/http://www.ofchoristers.net/Chapters/CambridgeKingsCollege.htm to http://www.ofchoristers.net/Chapters/CambridgeKingsCollege.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:13, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on King's College Chapel, Cambridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121107043829/http://www.cambridge.gov.uk/ccm/portal/ to http://www.cambridge.gov.uk/ccm/portal/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:21, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

King's College Chapel Organ

I am surprised there is no entry for the world famous organ in King's College Chapel. Would it be a good idea to include a section for this instrument? It is also worth noting that the organ case is also noteworthy, the chaire case being dated from at least 1660.Ds1994 (talk) 12:34, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Building of the chapel

The majority of this section currently covers the alterations done when the Rubens was installed in the 1960s. While this was controversial, the text is currently not WP:NPOV, giving the impression that it was universally regarded as a destructive outrage. I propse a "history of the chapel" section including the building of the chapel, but also the numerous alterations that have been done to the east end over the centuries, of which the 1960s work should be seen in the context of.----Pontificalibus 11:57, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[Steane2003-1] John Steane (20 May 2003). The Archaeology of the Medieval English Monarchy. Routledge. p. 177. ISBN 978-1-134-64159-8.

[1]