Talk:King World

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Major updates to meet standards

I have just cleaned up a good portion of this article to better meet Wikipedia standards. It could still use some work, but hopefully that helped. - SuperOctave, 6 April 2007

File:GW347H195.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:GW347H195.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 20:32, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bold text

Before it was reverted, I had removed some bold text from this article because I thought it wasn't used properly; not saying that all bold text is forbidden on Wikipedia. One reason is that "King World Enterprises" is already in bold in the introductory sentence. Another reason is that some company/service names in the body text are not synonymous with the exact topic company, with an exception from the next reason. Lastly, most other company articles in general do not have the names of related companies/services in bold, unless if they're deserved to have their own section or paragraph for notable reasons. TheGGoose (talk) 03:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]