Talk:Kingswinford
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
--86.29.246.253 (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Dreamworld fire
[edit]Was this really sufficiently significant to require mention? see WP:NOTNEWS. Peterkingiron (talk) 13:39, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Yes it was - it is a well-known event locally and is considered part of the area's history. Please restore the text. --81.178.158.207 (talk) 22:53, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
"clarification needed"
[edit]"but its position at the edge of the Black Country and its long standing in the area[clarification needed] means it has had significant industrial influence in the past."
Why should clarification be needed when it has already been said that Kingswinford goes back to the Domesday Book? Perhaps changing long standing to long history would help. --Oldontarian (talk) 13:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kingswinford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071001003528/http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10074460 to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10074460
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070707092431/http://users.ox.ac.uk/~peter/workhouse/Stourbridge/Stourbridge.shtml to http://users.ox.ac.uk/~peter/workhouse/Stourbridge/Stourbridge.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:04, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Kingswinford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090224195841/http://www.crestwood-s.dudley.gov.uk/index.htm to http://www.crestwood-s.dudley.gov.uk/index.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071220164035/http://www.yourdudley.com/ to http://www.yourdudley.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:53, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Kingswinford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.visionofbritain.org.uk/relationships.jsp?u_id=10136581 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050927235826/http://www.bromhills.dudley.gov.uk/ to http://www.bromhills.dudley.gov.uk/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051002002725/http://www.dingle.dudley.gov.uk/ to http://www.dingle.dudley.gov.uk/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060219041803/http://www.crestwood-p.dudley.gov.uk/ to http://www.crestwood-p.dudley.gov.uk/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070911002629/http://www.crestwoodchurch.org.uk/ to http://www.crestwoodchurch.org.uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:46, 11 December 2017 (UTC)