Talk:Korrespondent

Ukraine Mid‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

DAB an splitting

Should we make separate articles for korrespondent.net site and the Korrespondent (weekly)? They are affiliated but not quite one and the same thing. Much more different than, say, The New York Times and its online edition. --Irpen 02:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that would be alright.. —dima /talk/ 00:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes we should have separate articles. The current text is clearly rescribing the site, not the magazine. I'm suggesting the split officially. Ukrained (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

YSplit done. Ukrained2012 (talk) 18:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Influence

Korrespondent is not an influential magazine if only because pictures in every single issue grossly otweight the text. The Economist is influential, Foreign Affairs is influential. Korrespondent is not. Also, the reference 1 should be in English. —Preceding unsigned comment added by VladVic (talk • contribs) 23:18, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Alexa rank may be a sufficient independent indicator of influence. korrespondent.net is 23th in Ukraine. It's also influential among Internet users in Russia, Belarus and Moldova but I'm not sure what net indicator would support this fact. Happy edits, Ukrained2012 (talk) 18:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Korrespondent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100911220110/http://www.kppublications.com/eng/aboutus/ to http://www.kppublications.com/eng/aboutus/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]