Talk:Kri-kri
Appearance
![]() | A fact from Kri-kri appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 December 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
[edit]I can't get the 'name' part of the taxobox to work, that is Schinz who first classified the subsp. The reference should be Schinz | date = 1838 - can someone please help? Mtiedemann 10:32, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Simple enough fix... _parens, not _simple. I also debolded the species and genera, and used the G. s. subspecies standard which is now in favor. 68.81.231.127 08:53, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Shall I change the conservation status to domesticated or leave it as endangered? Dennis the mennis 17:48, 13 October 2020
Start a discussion about improving the Kri-kri page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Kri-kri" page.