Talk:Krishnath College

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject India / West Bengal / Education (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject West Bengal (marked as Low-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Education in India workgroup (marked as Low-importance).
 
WikiProject Schools (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Krishnath College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Krishnath College/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tushar Singha (talk · contribs) 03:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)--Peapod21 (talk) 23:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Review comment[edit]

The article contain language, grammer are correct. There is no template like unreference, citation needed, notability etc. . The article refer from 9 reliable sources.

Review comment[edit]

Disagreed. The article's grammar needs a lot of copy-editing. Lines like these: "Since 1853 this college fit to be declared a heritage institution has been unswervingly engaged in promoting and fostering education among the people of four districts such as Murshidabad, " make me doubt the neutrality of the article. It was written like an advertisement. It only has 9 sources, most of them from the school itself, and has no illustrations other than its emblem. It therefore fails points 1, 2, 4, and 6. Jesus, the person who wrote the comment above didn't even write it in correct grammar. You cannot judge an article's prose by its lack of templates. It is, frankly, badly written, and has 7/9 of the sources come from the institution itself or an affiliated institution. It is a far way from reaching any of the four points I stated it failed, and should instantly fail this nomination. I will be adding templates for all the problems. ALSO, the reviewer above attends the college. It says so in his userboxes! This is a clear conflict of interest. Peapod21 (talk) 22:42 June 30, 2017