Talk:Kuna Peak

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

@Dino: Hi, Dino. You reverted my edits here, but I believe they conform to Wikipedia guidelines:

MOS:HEAD directs us to not use the name of the article in section headings
WP:NOTHOWTO discourages "how-to" information in Wikipedia (which was the name of the section that I removed)
We don't need to link to Kuna Crest (Tuolumne), because the main article is now at Kuna Crest. There's no need to disambiguate Kuna Crest, since there are no other Wikipedia articles titled "Kuna Crest".
WP:OVERSECTION discourages sections with single sentences. Kuna Crest is already mentioned in the lede, so I removed "In the area".

I would like to restore the edit. What do you think? Do you think the previous version is consistent with Wikipedia style and guidelines? —hike395 (talk) 17:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Needs better photo[edit]

If somebody has a photo of Kuna Peak, please replace this one currently featured. I have added annotations on the file to show that this image isn't a good representation.Ron Clausen (talk) 08:04, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I found a better photo, but there is still room for improvement.Ron Clausen (talk) 05:17, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]