Jump to content

Talk:LGBTQ rights in Libya

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:LGBT rights in Libya)

Sharia law

[edit]

In December 2013, Sharia law has been passed by the Libyan National Assembly. Thus, death penalty is imposed. Japanesehelper (talk) 20:15, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on LGBT rights in Libya. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:58, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

punishment with death

[edit]

Claims of death, fines. vigilante attacks, beatings put into article by editor Lmharding have no refs for these things. It is all down to IS and Islamist militias. Not legal to do, so why put in "penalties'. Are these for laws? The refs are not as good as the ones that say 5 years. If you want to put it in, find a better reference. (Did I do this right?) 203.0.31.200 (talk) 00:26, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I made the same changes as before, for the same reasons. Being concise is good, being precise is even more important. The other version does not give crucial detail. This way is accurate and not really much longer. I wrote here before, but there was not any answer, just a return to same as before. Added reference details and a new reference were removed by the user, as well. 203.0.31.200 (talk) 01:57, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]