Talk:LNWR 2-2-2 3020 Cornwall

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

National Railway Museum (inactive)

This article is within the scope of National Railway Museum project, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.National Railway MuseumWikipedia:WikiProject National Railway MuseumTemplate:WikiProject National Railway MuseumNational Railway Museum articles

Trains: in UK / Locomotives Mid‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Notability of preserved steam locomotives

Please read my thread started at Talk:LMS 5MT Black 5 44806#Notability of preserved steam locomotives, thanks. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Cornwall

Cornwall is notable in her own right. She was a famous engine in her day, she was so famous when obsolete that she became an extremely rare early preservation, even at a time when we were over-run with engines. If for no other reason, she'd still be notable today even if she'd gone to the scrapper in the '60s. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:18, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then where are the references? The only reference in the stub so far is a link to a rail buff site. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The references are on the desk in front of me, waiting for a spare minute while I enter content into another article that you've threatened with imminent deletion. There are limits on how fast I can type. You have a template for deleting articles, those of us who contribute by adding content have to do it the hard way. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]