Talk:La Pacana

La Pacana has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 11, 2018. (Reviewed version).

A fact from La Pacana appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 March 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that one of the largest volcanic eruptions on Earth, at La Pacana in Chile, erupted 2,451–3,500 cubic kilometres of rock?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/La Pacana.

Wikipedia

Volcanoes High‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chile

	Chile portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chile, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chile on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChileWikipedia:WikiProject ChileTemplate:WikiProject ChileChile articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:La Pacana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 11:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:37, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a possible link for indurated?
Then, a most likely tectonic event such as: do you mean "Then a tectonic event, most likely..."?

Three points that are not an issue for GA, but I'll mention here for completeness:

As with Parinacota I see page numbers of the form "547, 548"; these should be "pp.", not "p.".
Your sources are out of order, and you have Shanaka L. de Silva under both S and D.
Why do you separate "Sources" and "Bibliography"? Wouldn't it make more sense to combine them?

-- Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:11, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Remedied the non-issues; as for the actual issues I've linked "indurated" and as for the second question, the source says In addition, the evidence for tectonic control on the caldera collapse is compelling..All of these observations are consistent with the hypothesis of an external, tectonic trigger for the eruption of the Atana magma, with or without weakening of the roof rocks as a result of the Toconao eruption. so I am not certain if that alternative is better. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The link for indurated is fine. For the other point, I think the wording I suggested would be OK, if I understand the source; what's in the article now is not very natural English. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way I now see a harv error on the first de Silva source; there's no cite pointing to it, and vice versa in the references. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mike Christie: Got all issues I think. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:40, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good; promoting. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 19:08, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]