Talk:Labour Conventions Reference

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Request for Donation - Canada not responding

I just got this message: "Hi reader in Canada, it seems you use Wikipedia a lot; that's great! It's a little awkward to ask, but this Monday we need your help. If you have already donated, we sincerely thank you. We’re not salespeople, but we depend on donations averaging $15 and fewer than 1% of readers give. If you donate just $3, the price of your coffee this Monday, Wikipedia could keep thriving. Thank you."

I can tell you why I won't give you anything. Wikipedia isn't a real encyclopedia. Wikipedia BLACKLISTS information it deems politically incorrect. I am a professional translator. My translations of a notable Quebec political figure (Adrien Arcand, 1899-1967) have been recognized by the Quebec National Archives which now carries my free eBooks and is duplicating my web site as a Quebec Heritage Site. Wikipedia, on the other hand, ONLY allows LEFTISTS to comment on the work and life of Adrien Arcand. Wikipedia BLACKLISTS not only Arcand's own works IN FRENCH, but also my English translations of him. This is cretinous, anti-intellectual, and disqualifies you as an "encyclopedia". In addition, some of Wikipedia's pages on Arcand disseminate FALSE information. Notably, you have given the names of Arcand's political parties as including the word "social-IST", which is not the case. You are damaging this Quebec political figure and his reputation quite deliberately.

In addition, I went to a lot of trouble to draft a biographical article for Wikipedia on the late Patrick "Pat" Walsh, who defected from the communists in 1952. I had a few sources up and online; Wikipedia BLACKLISTED that article, taking it offline, alleging it wasn't sourced. In other cases, of leftists and others, Wikipedia is HAPPY to post other people's DRAFT articles, only adding notices to them, "source required". But mine, well written, with some sources up, was taken down. I had translated substantial amounts of Pat Walsh's work and news articles into English and read extensively in order to write him up. But Wikipedia doesn't like ANTI-communists, so you imposed your FREE SPEECH BAN to forcibly alter history to suit yourselves.

Pat Walsh was an anticommunist. Adrien Arcand was an anticommunist.

No doubt because, i.e., the communists have mass-murdered upwards of 100 million innocent people.

Yet WIKIPEDIA SLAMS ANTICOMMUNISTS by blacklisting their work, their identities, and shutting them offline so no one can learn about them, least of all from themselves.

Wikipedia is NOT a real encyclopedia.

Wikipedia will not get a nickel from ME, in Canada, because you are BLACKLISTING my work, and the work of others.

https:// d o w n w i t h h a t e .wordpress.com/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.48.7.221 (talk) 22:04, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]