Talk:Laccadive Sea
Appearance
A fact from Laccadive Sea appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 July 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Laccadive Sea article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Nomenclature Disparity
[edit]The article does not sufficiently address which of the two names, used interchangeably in the article, is preferred, or if they are equally appropriate. For clarity, one name should be utilized consistently throughout unless there is a compelling reason to distinguish, in which case that distinguishing criterion should be described. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.255.233.99 (talk) 18:28, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
Name issue
[edit]If India, which owns the Lakshadweep Sea, why should we continue to call it Laccadive Sea? This was the result of the inability of a colonial power that was unable or diabolically changed all Sanskrit names to anglicized versions. 98.179.85.170 (talk) 16:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Start-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- Start-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class Lakshadweep articles
- High-importance Lakshadweep articles
- Start-Class Lakshadweep articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Lakshadweep articles
- Start-Class Indian geography articles
- High-importance Indian geography articles
- Start-Class Indian geography articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Indian geography articles
- WikiProject India articles