Talk:Lance Morrow
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Controversies
[edit]The controversy was a mess. The contention that Morrow had copied his bullet points from David Duke was not supported by the link and I can't find any other support for it on the web, so I changed it to more accurately reflect Harriot's column.
There was also a "response" from Morrow which was several paragraphs long and which didn't appear to be from any other source on the web; it certainly wasn't cited. The way it was worded, it seemed as though it was presented as Morrow responding directly in the article. That seemed like it violated the NPOV policy, the no original research policy, and the verifiability policy at least. I removed it. If the rebuttal exists somewhere other than this article, it seems like the thing to do would be to link it with a brief description and a citation. Mwphil (talk) 14:05, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Lance Morrow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061003003046/http://www.here-now.org/shows/2003/09/20030917_5.asp to http://www.here-now.org/shows/2003/09/20030917_5.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:00, 20 September 2017 (UTC)