Talk:Landlocked developing countries

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Landlocked developing countries article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

International relations: United Nations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Map needed

It is requested that a global map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.

Untitled

Isn't Serbia also a landlocked developing country? 78.3.111.198 (talk) 20:53, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Serbia is landlocked, but it is not a landlocked developing country. I'm not sure exactly why, but it may be due to the Tiza and other navigable waterways. If you want to, you can email the UN branch responsible for LLDCs here. --Master Bob (talk) 03:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By UN definition it is not.http://www.unohrlls.org/en/lldc/39/ Just as Singapore is a SIDS, despite being a very rich and advanced country.Phd8511 (talk) 13:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

merger

shouldn't this article be made a subsection of landlocked countries? Two articles mainly consisting of lists of countries aren't really that great. What about research concerning the economic development ouf landlocked developing countries? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.73.107.224 (talk) 19:16, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why some are not LLDCs

Kindly note that in order for a country to be considered an LDC, an assessment needs to be undertaken by the Committee for Development Policy. This assessment is based on a number of factors. So, in essence at this stage Southern Sudan is NOT an LDC until an assessment determines otherwise.

(communication with Ricardo Z. Dunn Public Information Officer, UN-OHRLLS

So DO NOT Change the list to your own whims and fancies.Phd8511 (talk) 13:10, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Landlocked developing countries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110928015547/http://www.un.org/special-rep/ohrlls/lldc/default.htm to http://www.un.org/special-rep/ohrlls/lldc/default.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bosnia not included?

Why bosnia is not a landlocked country despite seemingly landlocked? What is the antonym for landlocked country? 2404:8000:1027:2C72:2D91:F2FF:4381:40BE (talk) 13:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is not landlocked since it has a coast, and it is not a developing country. See the UN list https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/LDCs/Pages/ICT-Country-Profiles-of-the-Landlocked-Developing-Countries.aspx .Sjö (talk) 14:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]